Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0869120100120020081
±âÃÊ°£È£ÀÚ¿¬°úÇÐȸÁö
2010 Volume.12 No. 2 p.81 ~ p.88
The Effect of Warming Methods on the Vital Signs and Thermal Discomfort of the Patient with Gastrectomy
Hong Sung-Jung

Lee Ji-min
Kim Yun-Kyung
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare effects of intravenous fluid warming and forced-air warming on perioperative body temperature, Blood Pressure, Pulse and thermal discomfort after gastrectomy under general anesthesia.

Methods: Data collection was performed from October, 2009 to February, 2010. The intravenous fluid warming group (27) was warmed through an IV line by an Animec set to . The forced-air warming group (27) was warmed by Bair Hugger System. The warming continued from induction of general anesthesia to two hours after completion of surgery. The data was analyzed by t-test, , repeated measures ANOVA using SPSS/WIN 17.0.

Results: There was a significant difference of body temperature and thermal discomfort between the intravenous fluid warming group and the forced-air warming group.

Conclusion: We need to explore the effects combination of the intravenous fluid warming and the forced-air warming, and other warming therapy and the efficiency of modalities with regards to cost benefit is also needed.
KEYWORD
Warming, Vital signs, Thermal discomfort
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed